🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted voters with pledges to lower costs immediately upon taking office. But, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay minimal focus to the cost of living. All that changed following inflation-weary voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration initiated a hastily assembled effort to address living costs. Unfortunately, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Supermarket Reality

Just two days after the election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received statement: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from billionaire Trump—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties when visiting the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about price levels.

His assertion that everything was “way down” was highly misleading and inaccurate. In what way could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were increasing costs? Official statistics indicate banana prices increased nearly 7% in the last twelve months, the price of beef went up almost 15%, and coffee prices jumped by nearly 19%—partly because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in five of the six food categories tracked by the government’s price index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Financial Claims

In spite of the evidence, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “prices are way down,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements contradict the fact that prices overall have clearly increased since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is at a 3 percent per year, that’s half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump claimed that gas prices had dropped to around two dollars, even though official data indicate they average over three dollars.

Faced with actual conditions and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “prices are down” message made him sound dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. A lot of citizens are angry about rising costs following promises of decreases. In response, aides suggested one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move contradicted the president’s unrealistic claim that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Effects

With certain taxes being rolled back on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, the administration will likely announce that he has lowered costs once these products start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he ignited. In another instance, while speaking McDonald’s executives, he stated that “we are in the peak period of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans facing hardships—particularly when millions face cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a survey from October, three-quarters of respondents think the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter consider them good or excellent. Another poll found that 61% of Americans feel the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, lately contradicted claims of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and shed approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Pointing to this weakness, the secretary called on the central bank to cut interest rates—a move that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president suggested a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many households in need, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea could increase federal spending, increase interest rates, and possibly fuel inflation by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

A further supposed fix for cost issues involved introducing half-century home loans, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to reduce installments—frequently cutting them by just $100 or $200 per month. The drawback is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and slow building home value.

Faulting the Past Government and Financial Prospects

As part of their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have once more pointed fingers at the previous president for economic problems, such as increasing costs. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” This is absurd and untruthful claims. In reality, Biden left a robust economic situation, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. However, the current administration’s actions—particularly import taxes—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi fears that if large states like major economies enter a downturn, the US could face a broad economic slump. In downturns, people typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted affordability campaign probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.